Re: testing inconsistencies
Thanks for the explanation. :-)
Should bugs be filled against ftp.debian.org to get the archive
consistent? Or should we just wait for testing to sort itself out?
Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 03:07:16PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > I don't know why, but most xemacs21 packages in testing are at
> > version 21.4.1-2 except:
> > xemacs21 21.1.10-4
> > xemacs21-support 21.1.10-4
> > xemacs21-supportel 21.1.10-4
> > The first two of these renders it un-installable.
> > I thought this wasn't supposed to happen to testing?
>
> testing, uh, broke the other day (it got half way through commiting the
> packages that were meant to be in there, then stopped, presumably due
> to operator error). Stuff was recovered the next day, but unfortunately
> some pre-pooled debs couldn't be recovered and got replaced with their
> versions from unstable, xemacs21 included. (Various things are being put
> in place to make sure this doesn't happen again and is more easily and
> accurately recoverable if it does)
Reply to: