Re: Pre-ITP: Kernel-based PPP over X
Amy Fong <afong@furryterror.org> writes:
> Unfortunately my application process got "lost" when they restructured
> the new maintainer process.
>
> Since you're a Debian developer, logically you should take it.
Ok, I will most likely make a formal ITP soon. I will use your tree
as start.
> You may also want to either:
> Conflicts: pppoe
> or
> Replaces: pppoe
>
> (pppoe - D F Skoll's implementation)
Why is that necessary? Conflicting file names?
MfG,
Stephan
--
Stephan A Suerken <absurd@olurdix.de>
Reply to: