Re: debbugs can now send bug mails to someone different than the maintainer

[James Troup <james@nocrew.org>]

Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk> writes:

> What I am suggesting is that katie has a list of such cases (although
> I'm not proposing a particular format):

>From my point of view, such information would ideally be:

  o not centrally controlled, but package/maintainer(s) controlled[0]
  o trivial (both in terms of code and CPU use) for katie to obtain[1]
  o not unnecessarily waste space in places it's not needed[2]
 
I'd love to see suggestions that satisfy those criteria, but was
eventually someday going to fall back on something like Julian just
suggested if I couldn't find anything better.

-- 
James

[0] There's already too much centrally controlled information and no
    need for this information to be controlled centrally.

[1] Although correctness is far more important for katie than speed,
    it is a (minor) issue and katie is already relatively slow.  

[2] i.e. not in somewhere like the .dsc file.