Re: auditd as logrotate replacement?
Hi Arthur and discussion round,
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Arthur Korn wrote:
> So, basically, since auditd does feature encryption, it does not
> have any chance to be the default for log rotation, even if it
> was a lot better than logrotate? What giant pile of crap.
But what you could do is a virtual package that depends either on
logrotate or auditd.
That way the user *has* to install a logrotater but can choose between the
two options.
Or am I missing sth?
*t
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tomas Pospisek
SourcePole - Linux & Open Source Solutions
http://sourcepole.ch
Elestastrasse 18, 7310 Bad Ragaz, Switzerland
Tel: +41 (81) 330 77 11
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: