Re: chroot bind?
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 07:27:56PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> put into a chroot is named and named-xfer, apparently named is not
> actually necessary.
Which was my point. Glad we got that settle. ;)
> /etc/init.d/sysklogd is a conffile, sysklogd cannot change it without
> the admin's permission. as for how this package changes it i don't
> know, there is no policy compliant way to do it other then a message
> to the admin saying if they want bind to log they have to fix the
> initscript themselves.
Hmm. Which means there is never going to be any default easy way of
installing bind-chroot and just having it work.
Nicholas
Reply to: