Re: chroot bind?
On Sun, 22 Apr 2001 nic@plumtree.co.nz wrote:
>
>
> Just two questions:
>
> i) Is there any reason why you decided to include the named binaries in
> the chroot?
>
Because I was following the instructions at
http://www.psionic.com/papers/dns/linux-dns which suggests named and
named-xfer should go there. I decided to throw the rest in there too. :-)
But if we don't need them there we should definitely take them out.
>
>
> ii) Is there a particular reason to use /var/secure-bind rather than
> say /var/named which seems to be some what of an informal default.
>
Because it is a non-standard /var directory, I thought it would be helpful
to name it after the package it belonged to.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar@debian.org>
Reply to: