Re: chroot bind?
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 12:04:38PM +1200, Nicholas Lee wrote:
>
> > > > Please CC: not subscribe.
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 03:13:33AM -0500, Bryan Andersen wrote:
> > Bryan Andersen wrote:
> > >
> > > Do it under /var/named, this follows other OSes conventions. Another
>
>
> Problem is that does meet the FHS: "Applications must generally not add
> directories to the top level of /var.Such directories should only be
> added if they have some system-wide implication, and in consultation
> with the FHS mailing list." Which means it doesn't meet the debian
> policy.
>
>
> I think you've right though. Pretty much everyone else uses
> /var/named/.
>
> Is there any reason why anyone in debian would complain seriously about
> binaries, confiles, and device nodes /var/named for security??
>
/var/chroot/, maybe?
then /var/chroot/named would be the chroot for named.
--
-> -/- - Rahul Jain - -\- <-
-> -\- http://linux.rice.edu/~rahul -=- mailto:rahul-jain@usa.net -/- <-
-> -/- "I never could get the hang of Thursdays." - HHGTTG by DNA -\- <-
|--|--------|--------------|----|-------------|------|---------|-----|-|
Version 11.423.999.220020101.23.50110101.042
(c)1996-2000, All rights reserved. Disclaimer available upon request.
Reply to: