Re: Format of Description fields
Previously Daniel Burrows wrote:
> My question is, is this still the case?
> The packaging manual is no longer an official source of information as far
> as I know, and the policy section corresponding to this conspicuously omits
> the formatting information.
The document that will become the dpkg reference manual does specify
> In short: should frontends perform word-wrapping or not?
> Should bugs of appropriate severity (normal or minor IMO) be filed against
> packages which improperly format their descriptions or not?
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
| firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |