Re: Bug#88588: libpam-modules: pam-limits.so is broken
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Ben Collins wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 08:14:22PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
>> This is the second time reportbug's been mentioned: once by you and once
>> by Joey Hess. If it's so functional, why isn't email@example.com being
>> deprecated for it?
>Yeah, that's an argument.
No, it was a question... The argument's done....
>"If the Integrated Development Environment is so great, why not
>deprecate gcc and make for it?"
I'm betting you'd have quite a few people that agreed with your rhetorical
Pardon me, but you have obviously mistaken me for someone who gives a