Re: limitation in build-depends
>>>>> " " == Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 07:45:48AM +0100, Goswin Brederlow
>> >>>>> " " == Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk> writes:
>> > On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 12:20:45AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Julian Gilbey wrote: >> >> >... > (NB
>> It might be worth then putting a check into the >> package
>> build that > the correct library is installed. You may >> well
>> have already done > this, though.)
>> Normaly you use automake/autoconf and just insert a check for
>> the library into the configure.in file. If neigther one nor the
>> other library is installed, let the configure fail.
>> If you don't have a configure file, just make one and copy the
>> relevant stuff into the rules file, if you wish.
> Absolutely. But if you're specifying from the start that you
> should be building the kb5 version, you should probably ensure
> that this happens.
And if kb5 is not installed, it just fails instead of switching to the
I don't see a problem there.
>> >> Why should he need this? libkrb5-dev conflicts with
>> heimdal-dev >> what means that if he Build-Depends on one of
>> them the other >> one won't be installed when compiling.
>> > But this assumes that the builder has taken the care to
>> honour > the Build-Depends line. Better not to assume such
>> Yes, DO assume such stuff. The autobuilder in action do and
>> everything would break if not.
>> If the autobuilder does not honor the Build-Depends, the
>> package will not build. Autobuilder gets fixeds. Storry ends.
> The autobuilder may be OK, but sometimes packages are built
> manually, and we wouldn't want those to go wrong either.
Yes, thats what configure scripts are for. Most Debian packages
specify exactly what features to use for the configure, so if you
forgot one library, it still gets requested and the configure failes.