[Gerfried Fuchs <alfie@innocent.com> wrote about dropping icq field] > Jason said he won't decide - I really understand that. But maybe if > some of the other 113 people that are currently using the icq field (or > also others, that might use the jabber field) could comment on this it > would be greatly encouraged to express your feelings :-) I'm one of the other 113. I just filled in the blank because it was there. Supporting, encouraging a free system is the Right Thing to do and has my vote. That said, if we're going to reorganize the contact details, how about rolling irc into the mix. I don't really use irc or icq that much but fill in the blanks because I stop by from time to time. What might be better is a list box of common (or uncommon) systems and a space to enter specific details. Thus you might have primary/secondary, each one being icq/aim/jabber/irc/whatever with a suitable length field to enter the data.... But ... to just remove ICQ with Jabber id would be a great way to start the ball rolling. Dave -- - Dave Baker : dave@dsb3.com : dave@devbrain.com : http://dsb3.com/ GnuPG: 1024D/D7BCA55D / 09CD D148 57DE 711E 6708 B772 0DD4 51D5 D7BC A55D
Attachment:
pgppgxGlQL5rV.pgp
Description: PGP signature