Re: Misclassification of packages; "libs" and "doc" sections
OK, here we go with a directed acycllic graph of package-classifications:
All Packages
+-Base-System
+-Development-Files
+ +-<Link-to: All Packages> (I think there are headers for nearly everything)
+-Services
| +-Server
| | +-Mail
| | +-Web
| | +-Time
| | +- ...
| +-XServer
| +-Window-Manager
| +-Misc
| +-gpm
| +-nttpd
+-Applications
| +-Administration
| +-Development
| +-Text
| | +-Editors
| | +-Tex
| +-Sound
| | +-Playing
| | +-Editing
| +-Images
| | +-Viewing
| | +-Editing
| +-Offices
| | +StarOffice :)
| | +KDE Office Suite
| +-Web
| +-Clients
| +-HTML-Editor
| +-
|
+-Games
| +-Strategie (yeah, lets categorize games by genre, not by svgalib or so)
| ....
+-Kernel
+-Patches
Reply to: