Packages web pages
I am posting here because I am not sure of which package to file bugs against
for the cgi.debian.org scripts.
Firstly it doesn't explain where the quality numbers come from. Let me
assure you that bonnie++ 0.99e is no where near 100% quality. Version 1.00d
only has one bug outstanding which is not in the Debian system because it
seems that no Debian users have encountered it.
Why isn't 1.00d closer to 100%? What do I have to do to get a higher quality
rating than the other Bonnie programs?
Also when going through the web pages for my package it seems that the CGI
scripts have some problems with the '+' character in a package name...
stable
100%
bonnie++ 0.99e (33.7k)
This is Russell Coker's hard drive bottleneck testing program,
stable
88%
bonnie 1-3 (19.2k)
File System Performance Benchmark
unstable
80%
bonnie 2.0.6-big-1 (9k)
File System Performance Benchmark
unstable
67%
bonnie++ 1.00d (38.8k)
This is Russell Coker's hard drive bottleneck testing program,
Responses 1-4 of 4 responses shown.
--
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/projects.html Projects I am working on
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
Reply to: