Re: package pools testing distribution
>>>>> "Anthony" == Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
Anthony> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 03:18:05PM +1100, Brian May
Anthony> wrote:
>> What happens if package "a" depends on package "b" in unstable,
>> and package "a" meets the criteria to get moved into testing,
>> but package "b" does not?
>>
>> Will package "a" still be moved into testing?
Anthony> Right. If "a" can be installed once it's in testing
Anthony> (either because there's an old version of "b", or a
Anthony> package "c" that provides: "b", or something similar),
Anthony> it'll go in, if not it won't.
If for some reason, a package cannot be upgraded in testing, is it
easy to find out why?
--
Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Reply to: