Re: Registration for maintainer script-managed files (Was: Re: 2 questions on dpkg and 1 for m68k, thanks)
>>>>> "Matt" == Matt Zimmerman <email@example.com> writes:
Matt> This is another reason why I think we need a more flexible
Matt> way to declare package ownership of files. Even if a
Matt> filesystem object is managed by the maintainer scripts, we
Matt> should be able to use the power of the packaging system to
Matt> track who is responsible for it, and prevent conflicts.
Matt> How about a mechanism similar to conffiles? A package
Matt> should be able to register these files somehow.
I completely agree with you. (sidenote: what should a package do when
it attempts to register a file that is already registered? How should
update-alternatives be handled? Should update-alternatives support
this scheme and automatically register the file to the correct
Also, I think it should be dpkgs responsibility to delete all files
and directories belonging to a package (when purging the package).
(not sure about update-alternatives). It should keep track of any
files/directories which can't be deleted too.
For example, if I try to purge xyz, but for some reason it can't
delete /etc/xyz/ (for instance maybe the system administrator
accidently moved an important file, like /etc/passwd into
Current situation: Either:
1. dpkg would print a warning (which is easy to miss), completely forget
about the directory, and mark the package as purged.
2. maintainer script would "rm -rf /etc/xyz".
dpkg should remember these files so that a latter attempt to purge the
package will succeed, and so you don't have old directories sitting
around doing nothing.
Brian May <firstname.lastname@example.org>