Re: Proposal for a new package relationship option
>>"Thomas" == Thomas Bushnell, BSG <tb@becket.net> writes:
Thomas> In the situation you describe, there is no need for
Thomas> Discourages at all. A system administrator is not helped by
Thomas> saying "Discourages" because at the systems administration
Thomas> level, the level of package management, there is nothing
Thomas> inconsistent about the two packages at all.
You have a point there.
manoj
--
I know what "custody" [of the children] means. "Get even." That's
all custody means. Get even with your old lady. Lenny Bruce
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: