Re: 2.2r1 release problems
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 11:15:36PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > I was a little surprised too. I don't think it's necessarily advance
> > warning that's necessary, but I do think that a release announcement
> > should go out at the time of the release, and that the web site should
> > be updated.
> Historicaly we have done neither, go back and look at 2.0 releases 1
> through 4 (or was it 7?)
Regardless of what has happened in the past, is there a good reason NOT to
announce a new revision/release when it becomes public and is available on
debian's ftp servers?
Adam McKenna <email@example.com> | "No matter how much it changes,
http://flounder.net/publickey.html | technology's just a bunch of wires
GPG: 17A4 11F7 5E7E C2E7 08AA | connected to a bunch of other wires."
38B0 05D0 8BF7 2C6D 110A | Joe Rogan, _NewsRadio_
2:16am up 157 days, 32 min, 11 users, load average: 0.11, 0.06, 0.02