Re: Locales in new libc: eeew!
> > Previously Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
> > > What!! An hexdump? Is someone insane? The SUSv2 standard
> > (Unix98) allows
> > > using the characters themselves... why would we want
> > something like this?
> > Unicode perhaps?
> Definitely Unicode, but he's right that there must be some subset of Unicode
> (either ASCII or ISO 8859-1:1987) that should be usable as is...
More than that. All characters in unicode do have a name, and that's how
they should be referenced: My name is... <N><I><C><O><L><AACUTE><S>.