Re: Bug#70269: automatic build fails for potato
On 30-Aug-00, 15:08 (CDT), Wichert Akkerman <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Previously Steve Greenland wrote:
> > It is not unreasonable to assume that the latest-and-greatest version of
> > all the build-essential packages will be installed.
> I wonder what world you are living in. It is in reality a completely
> unreasonable assumption.
Are you saying that someone running a build daemon is not going to keep
up-to-date on build-essential packages? Why not? And if not, why is
my (the maintainer's) job to keep changing the version numbers in my
control file to force it to happen?
Steve Greenland <email@example.com>
(Please do not CC me on mail sent to this list; I subscribe to and read
every list I post to.)