Re: Mutt & Mail-Followup-To header (Re: old bugs info)
Adrian Bunk <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Jun 14, Stephen Frost <email@example.com> wrote:
> > > So pine is supposted to support/understand an invented mail header?
> > Yes. Software can be upgraded and improved, you know?
> But you can't expect other programs to support the proprietary extentions
> one program makes to a standard.
On the other hand, Mail-Followup-To is not really a proprietary
extension. There are, or at least were, people working on writing
an RFC about it. See for example:
It's nice if mailers use and support it, but things should work anyway.
Reply-To doesn't work as a substitute, it is overloaded with too many
This has, of course, been discussed on debian-devel at least twice.
Lars Wirzenius <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Architect, Kannel WAP and SMS Gateway project, Wapit Ltd, http://www.kannel.org