Re: New shmfs and Debian
On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 04:33:47PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> Lawrence Walton wrote:
> > Some think /var/shm, others /dev/shm, and still others /shm.
> > I think /shm is the simplest least intrusive.
>
> Please explain how adding
> yet-another-useless-top-level-directory-in-direct-violation-of-fhs-and-fsstnd
> is "less intrusive" than burying it somewhere where you won't stumble over
> it every day?
>
> --
> see shy jo
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
No more then /proc or /dev.
--
*--* Mail: lawrence@otak.com
*--* Voice: 425.739.4247
*--* Fax: 425.827.9577
*--* HTTP://www.otak-k.com/~lawrence/
--------------------------------------
- - - - - - O t a k i n c . - - - - -
Reply to: