Re: A "progressive" distribution
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> In article <Pine.GS4.firstname.lastname@example.org> you wrote:
> > After reading this nice diskussion with all it's aspects, I want to
> > complete the mess and suggest a "distribution" called
> > e.g. "progressive" beetween stable(frozen) and unstable.
> I gather you haven't read the discussion of package pools in the archive?
Not all of it, and after reading some people not having the same option of
that I wanted to suggest an additional idea, that is more simple (both in
the sence of less advantages and less work).
> First things first. Let's get potato released,
As I wrote, nothing can be changed before.
Bernhard R. Link