Re: Packages removed from frozen

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Packages removed from frozen
From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
Date: 02 Mar 2000 16:37:16 -0600
Message-id: <87d7pdq9r7.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com>
In-reply-to:
References: <20000128161610.A13321@xs4all.nl> <8766w1557j.fsf@raven.localnet> <87900wsu4l.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com> <20000207142942.A14269@x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu> <87emaoqq9n.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com> <20000208003751.A22760@x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu> <20000208215607.D8900@ecn.purdue.edu> <20000209132405.A10941@azure.humbug.org.au> <87og9qzjvo.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com> <20000209221100.B15122@azure.humbug.org.au> <87u2jiufk1.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com> <u1hu2iq1qig.fsf@alice-whacker.mit.edu>

>>"Thomas" == Thomas Bushnell, BSG <tb@mit.edu> writes:

 Thomas> Why dispensation?  There is no prohibition of circular build depends,
 Thomas> and if you think there should be, then propose it on debian-policy.

        Before you go jumping on people, it is conventional to float a
 balloon here in -devel.

        Also, please read the whole thread. We all reached a
 conclusion a while back, and reopening a flame is counter
 productive. 

        manoj
-- 
 Vitamin C deficiency is apauling.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Packages removed from frozen
  - From: tb@mit.edu (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)

Prev by Date: Re: Problems with ftpd, wu-ftpd, and proftpd packages?
Next by Date: xterm-color bug [solved: urlview error on slang]
Previous by thread: Re: Packages removed from frozen
Next by thread: Re: Packages removed from frozen
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread