Re: Please help, I'm desperate (SAMBA)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 16-Feb-2000 aphro wrote:
> can samba even do roaming profiles? (im not even sure what roaming
> profiles are) i didn't see any mention of it in the FAQ. after looking at
> the PROFILES.txt from samba looks like that may be what you want. If you
> still can't get it working upgrade to samba 3.0 (alpha) i spent hours
> trying to fix a dissapearing file/directory problem on 2.0 and it was
> fixed the instant i upgraded to 3.0
Yes it can. Any SMB server that declares itself to be a domain auth can. It is
a matter of proper directory structure, permissions and proper share
definitions in smb.conf (plus knowing a few quircks documented in fair detail
in most releases of the Windows SDK).
Can we get this [OT] off the list because some of the docs are (C) Microsoft
and are in properly copyrighted proprietary specs. I tried to write some docs on
this long ago and post them publically but got righteously grilled (The docs I
wrote where s... anyway). If anyone can help Onno I suggest do it off the lists
ulness you want to get grilled for nothing for (C) violation.
P.S. I already did my share from what I remember the last time I set this up.
- ----------------------------------
Anton R. Ivanov
IP Engineer Level3 Communications
RIPE: ARI2-RIPE E-Mail: Anton Ivanov <aivanov@eu.level3.net>
@*** Murphy's Laws (No 8 of 11) ***
If everything seems to be going well, you have obviously
overlooked something.
- ----------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iQEVAwUBOKrHnClWAw/bM84zAQHdtQf+KtXDVve/kcIdBS12JtvEWrrekAUDqGvw
U/dtpDdf9m3ZtfYVmulrGQVi1Y9CvuC3WAb6IsLX7QcVgrO28UOPG8xNYBXyAYsX
Z6itY4UHsm+c2qtHwZneI+SME6KOc/CXB+Zn/l8ElYjrsEwRXYGyGO/go8gBAMf2
YdGsBOr5+Xd2/U3WyJ0+O1zolbLVBKUN5eBld542dctKbVfR9eaOIK11dGYGE/5r
K6oWIofymHjOKKQbXNMg1v8UgBQZBQH7QbPNJThsmxWiU39gwwlVi2UVEU3t81ZN
U+iIHRpHQFbgDQjAISHNy/ytxN0OI7lWT6QSSm64mGiHIWPC/XDfrg==
=QOqu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: