Re: should we split up the Packages file in main (for woody)

To: Debian Developement Mailinglist <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: should we split up the Packages file in main (for woody)
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 21:49:46 +0100
Message-id: <20000213214946.E31105@mors.net>
Mail-followup-to: Debian Developement Mailinglist <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <20000213212417.F500@zanaga.uusikaupunki.fi>; from ressu@uusikaupunki.fi on Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 09:24:17PM +0200
References: <20000213212417.F500@zanaga.uusikaupunki.fi>

Previously ressu@uusikaupunki.fi wrote:
> ok, lets face it.. the packages file in slink is something like <500K
> (in i386) in potato its >800K.. i think it might be time to start
> splitting it up... 

Lets wait for package pools, which should help with this as well.

WIchert.

-- 
   ________________________________________________________________
 / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience  \
| wichert@liacs.nl                    http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Attachment: pgpGE12ao4PNB.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: should we split up the Packages file in main (for woody)
  - From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ualberta.ca>
- Re: should we split up the Packages file in main (for woody)
  - From: Fabien Ninoles <fabien@Nightbird.TZoNE.ORG>

References:
- should we split up the Packages file in main (for woody)
  - From: ressu@uusikaupunki.fi

Prev by Date: Re: netbase 3.16-10 and TCP SYN cookies being enabled by default
Next by Date: Re: should we split up the Packages file in main (for woody)
Previous by thread: Re: should we split up the Packages file in main (for woody)
Next by thread: Re: should we split up the Packages file in main (for woody)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread