[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#57218: /usr/local erased



Hi Erick, 

On Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 10:01:42AM -0600, Erick Kinnee wrote:

> So how many actual reports of /usr/local getting wiped have come in? I

Zero.

> personally think both of Torsten and Santiago have been known to make
> decisions that are not the most technically sound. If even ONE person

Thank you very much. How did you get that impression? If you think my
decisions are not technically sound I invite you to take over my 
packages and do better. I have to say I am really pissed by this mail.
Please tell me when I made a decision which was not technically sound. 
I would really like to learn. And if nobody tells me what I did wrong
I will not become better.

> has had this directory cleared because of your mistake, it's one too
> many.

I agree. But this bug will not remove /usr/local if any files or directories
are in there. Actually it is a dpkg bug. Whoever is at fault I do not really
care. If somebody is tracking unstable he should expect to run into little
problems sometimes. And if a symlink /usr/local is removed you are able
to fix that easily and it is not a hidden problem. 

If the problem were more easily missed or if there is a real data loss 
I would have fixed it no matter what it takes. But I don't see such a 
big problem here and I do not want to spend my time for something so 
minor.

If you think a patch for this is urgently needed please submit it to the
BTS and I will get it in ASAP.

Thanks for the fish

    Torsten

-- 
Torsten Landschoff           Bluehorn@IRC               <torsten@debian.org>
           Debian Developer and Quality Assurance Committee Member


Reply to: