Re: INN packages
In article <cistron.20000119194851.B807@wonderland.linux.it>,
Marco d'Itri <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>On Jan 18, Miquel van Smoorenburg <email@example.com> wrote:
> >>They are not. Plain simply, uniover sucks under load and it's much
> >>slower than the traditonal overview database. INN 2.x is useful only
> >>on transit servers.
> >Nonsense, ofcourse. That's only if you turn on a storage method. With
>True, but if you don't use a storage method why bothering installing
Faster access to bugfixes? Same server on reader and feeder ?
Standard support for perl filters ? Just to name a few.
Hey, you asked ..
The From: and Reply-To: addresses are internal news2mail gateway addresses.
Reply to the list or to firstname.lastname@example.org (Miquel van Smoorenburg)