Re: Poor failure recovery
On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 01:09:27PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> Excellent, so if there is a statically-linked sash, this cuts down on
sash (stand alone shell) is statically linked. There is no dynamically linked
> > It might be nice to have a statically linked fsck.
Also note that fsck is more than one executable (ls /sbin/fsck*).
> > Is there any particular advantage to having a statically linked
> > cat? [Are you wanting to run shell scripts on a heavily damaged
> > system?]
> You need something to view files. Maybe "more".
sash has a -more builtin.