Re: Intent package mule2 and custom-mule (Important for emacs (lisp) package maintainers)
>>>>> On 20 Oct 1999 01:24:48 +0200
>>>>> "MF" == Mike Fabian <email@example.com> wrote...
>> At Wed, 20 Oct 1999 00:15:56 +0900,
>> Takao KAWAMURA <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > I intent to package "mule2" which is Mule2.3 based on Emacs19.
> > Mule is MULtilingual Enhancement to GNU Emacs.
> > About Mule, please see <URL:http://www.m17n.org/mule/>.
> I do not think it is a good idea. Why must we have mule2
> based on emacs19 though emacs20 includes MULE? I think
> Mule2.3 is obsolete or to be obsolete.
>> Because emacs20 doesn't have full features mule2.3 had,
>> especially Japanese input supports.
MF> Isn't the Japanese input support of XEmacs 21.1 sufficient? Canna,
MF> Wnn and SKK are supported. I use Canna and it seems to work well.
Yes, you are right. But XEmacs is too big for poor machies.
And we do not need any X extensions of XEmacs when working on console
, terminal emulators or so.