[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: aterm packages ?



On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 01:19:24AM -0400, Hugo Haas wrote:
> > Didn't somebody ITP aterm?  What's the status on that?
> 
> Samuel Hocevar <sam@via.ecp.fr> did package aterm (after sending an ITP). He
> asked me to upload his package since he is not a maintainer yet.
> 
> However, there were a couple of problems so I did not upload the first
> version. A new version should be soon available.

Make sure to /**/ the #define LINUX_KEYS eh?  I prefer to use xterm-debian
or rxvt as TERM, and that doesn't work well if you have LINUX_KEYS
defined.  If you have TERM=linux the fonts are wrong!

-- 
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>             Debian GNU/Linux developer
GnuPG: 2048g/3F9C2A43 - 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC  44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
PGP 2.6: 2048R/50BDA0ED - E8 D6 84 81 E3 A8 BB 77  8E E2 29 96 C9 44 5F BE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"All we have to fear is fear itself!"
"And almost but not quite free software..."
"That too."
"And binary only kernel drivers."
"Okay, yeah, that too."
"And..."
"---shush."

Attachment: pgpCKQ8_sHIEE.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: