Re: NOT done!

To: lazarus@overdue.dhis.org (Lazarus Long)
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org ( Debian developers list)
Subject: Re: NOT done!
From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 00:49:28 +0100 (BST)
Message-id: <[🔎] E11R2KG-0006th-00@polya>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19990913013950.A22742@overdue.dhis.org> from Lazarus Long at "Sep 13, 1999 1:39:50 am"

> WHY is this bug marked "done"???
> 
> There is NO explanation, nor has the problem been fixed!
> 
> Please explain!
> 
>  > Subject: Bug#42295: marked as done (console-apt: Suggests, Recommends, Depends, Provides ...)
> 
> Closing a bug with NO explanation and without fixing the problem is
> very wrong.

Perhaps someone made a typo and closed the wrong bug?

   Julian

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

  Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk
        Debian GNU/Linux Developer,  see http://www.debian.org/~jdg

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: NOT done!
  - From: Paul Slootman <paul@wau.mis.ah.nl>

References:
- NOT done!
  - From: Lazarus Long <lazarus@overdue.dhis.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Migrating to GPG - A mini-HOWTO
Next by Date: Re: /opt/ again (was Re: FreeBSD-like approach for Debian? [was: ...])
Previous by thread: NOT done!
Next by thread: Re: NOT done!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread