Re: [phil@hands.com: m68k 2.1_r3 unsatisfied dependency trn-->libncurses4(>= 4.2-3.1)]

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-m68k@lists.debian.org, m68k-build@nocrew.org
Subject: Re: [phil@hands.com: m68k 2.1_r3 unsatisfied dependency trn-->libncurses4(>= 4.2-3.1)]
From: Roman Hodek <Roman.Hodek@informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1999 11:18:16 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-id: <[🔎] 199909060918.LAA18898@faui22c.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Reply-to: m68k-build@nocrew.org
In-reply-to: <19990905011147.A19050@watervalley.net> (message from Chris Lawrence on Sun, 5 Sep 1999 01:11:47 -0500)
References: <19990905011147.A19050@watervalley.net>

> trn in m68k 2.1_r3 depends on libncurses4(>= 4.2-3.1), which isn't
> in slink.
[...]

I'll build a new slink version ASAP.

This trn version is rather old AFAICS, I can't tell you who built that
version apparently on a potato system...

> Can we not install things with unsatisfied dependencies into stable
> in future please ?

Would be a nice feature to automatically check deps :-)

Roman

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [phil@hands.com: m68k 2.1_r3 unsatisfied dependency trn-->libncurses4(>= 4.2-3.1)]
  - From: Roman Hodek <Roman.Hodek@informatik.uni-erlangen.de>

Prev by Date: Re: ITR: gtk+-docs (Was: Re: gtk-tutorial)
Next by Date: Re: [phil@hands.com: m68k 2.1_r3 unsatisfied dependency trn-->libncurses4(>= 4.2-3.1)]
Previous by thread: Re: Strategy: DNS server in main for potato?
Next by thread: Re: [phil@hands.com: m68k 2.1_r3 unsatisfied dependency trn-->libncurses4(>= 4.2-3.1)]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread