Re: [Proposal] Forget PAM, stick with NSS
On Sat, Jul 31, 1999 at 06:10:51PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Matt Ryan <email@example.com> writes:
> > I'm a big fan of small dependancies for packages. I can't see any reason why
> > we should start PAMifing packages when AFAICS it only gives the same
> > functionality as the NSS part of glibc. I have setup libnss-ldap and it works
> > very well - why would I need PAM?
> Can nss fallback or use pam?
> Otherwise I will still need pam for afs? Since afs is not free,
> changing is probably impossible.
for a free afs try searching for arla....
email: firstname.lastname@example.org, http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett
Windows NT - Unix in beta-testing. PGP key available on public key servers
Avoid tiresome goat sacrifices -=- use Debian Linux http://www.debian.org