Re: Postfix as default MTA?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 29 Jun 1999 17:28:34 +0200, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
><SARCASTIC MODE>
>Sorry, I assumed that people on this list would be able to understand
>"universal" as "suitable for most common usages", but obviously I was
>wrong.
></SARCASTIC MODE>
What we have now is suitable for most common usages.
>Despite your PERIOD, I will answer this one: of course I hope that admins
>running large mailing lists should be able to change their MTA, but they
>won't have to if they get a solid one from start.
Which Exim is.
>I do not understand why you seem to be getting upset with this proposal. At
>this time, nobody proposes to get Postfix as the *default* mailer (this has
>been discussed), but to package it for main and have some developers use it
>(especially developers previously using exim) and give their feeling.
<SARCASTIC MODE>
Really. I guess the thread is titled "Postfix as default MTA?" just for
shits and giggles?
</SARCASTIC MODE>
Slink just switched to Exim as the default mailer. Do we really think it
is needed to change default mailers *again* within 1-2 versions?
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
- -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc
iQA/AwUBN3jxHHpf7K2LbpnFEQKFLwCdE3za3tEcYdSO1eKMUw7JGCND+KwAn0PD
I2ESoGtDr8zLAWQkgb3S4E3+
=wZrH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: