Re: [PAM] service names: What should they be?
Apparently 'service' in PAMspeak has a slightly different meaning. Based
on what Ben wrote I think imap, pop2, and pop3 will be appropriate.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar@debian.org>
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> > I've added PAM support to my IMAP package. This has a total of three
> > daemons which can use PAM: /usr/sbin/imapd (in imap), /us/sbin/ipop2d and
> > /us/sbin/ipop3d (in ipopd.) I know I have to create files in /etc/pam.d
> > for them but what should they be called?
>
> The second part you quoted suggests using "imapd", "ipop2d" and "ipop3d"
> as service names (at least that is how I read it).
>
> Wichert.
>
> --
> ==============================================================================
> This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
> E-Mail: wichert@cs.leidenuniv.nl
> WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
>
Reply to: