Re: building Debian source packages
> The problem is that both use the same lib name (lesstif has to so it can be
> a replacement for Motif).
This is not really true. Lesstif does use the same soname, but it
doesn't have to. It only aims for source compatibility, so it would
be sufficient to have a libXm.so in the development package. It would
be nice if it didn't use the same name for the shared library. I've
tried and failed to convince the Lesstif authors of this.