Re: Conflicting packages not of extra priority.

[John Hasler <john@dhh.gt.org>]

Santiago Vila writes:
> If package A conflicts with package B, they conflict regardless of
> A also replacing, providing or whatever else B.

Are you saying that if A c/p/r's B and B is Optional that A must go in
Extra even though it is replacing B?  That's unreasonable.

I think the rule was intended to apply to simple conflicts, not to special
uses such as c/p/r.
-- 
John Hasler                This posting is in the public domain.
john@dhh.gt.org		   Do with it what you will.
Dancing Horse Hill         Make money from it if you can; I don't mind.
Elmwood, Wisconsin         Do not send email advertisements to this address.