Re: glibc 2.1 and potato

[Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>]

Hi.

Stupid question:

Will this glibc 2.1 make all the new packages to have a line like this?:

Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1)

[ I guess so ].

Is this good/bad nice/ugly desirable/undesirable?

-- 
 "26f85e3fce5d0e8970c751297ba4afb7" (a truly random sig)