Re: GPL v LGPL for libraries
> > Now everything is legal. But is there anything substantially different
> > in these two cases? Except for implementation details, of course.
>
> Yes, there is. It is both inconvenient to write wrappers for each GPL
> function you wish to use, and inefficient as it is a lot of overhead to
> call one routine. The difference is encouragement that you should release
> the source to your program, and license it under the GPL.
As you noticed, I was talking about the program with released source,
and even more, releases with *free* license (say, similar to NPL).
And why do I need encouragment in this case?
Thanks,
Alex Y.
--
_
_( )_
( (o___ +-------------------------------------------+
| _ 7 | Alexander Yukhimets |
\ (") | http://pages.nyu.edu/~aqy6633/ |
/ \ \ +-------------------------------------------+
Reply to: