Re: frozen-proposed-updates (was Re: Linux 2.0.36 in slink?)
On Thu, Dec 17, 1998 at 09:27:54PM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> > Do you really think we can get slink out the door in 3 weeks?
>
> Maybe what we can do is create a proposed-updates section for slink
> *now*, to hold important-but-insufficiently-tested things like 2.0.36.
> Then, when we actually do get around to releasing slink, we can decide
> which, if any, of the things in the proposed-updates section should be
> merged in.
>
> IOW, use the same policy as the stable release.
I really don't like the idea much. It's just moving the problem around,
I would rather see us solve it personally.
--
Sig du jour!
Reply to: