Re: mass bug reporting on guile 1.2
Craig Brozefsky <craig@onshore.com> writes:
> Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org> writes:
>
> > I've just received two identical bug reports on geda saying it
> > depends on guile 1.2. One was from noone@hatchet.bluff.org,
> > the other was from buggy55@hotmail.com. Neither of these
> > look valid; the message text was identical.
> >
> > Would anyone care to explain? The bug report is legitimate,
> > but I don't need two identical copies from dodgy-looking
> > addresses.
>
> Is guile1.2 going to be in slink? I was really hopeing it could stick
> around. I presently use it for some work because it's I/O is a bit
> faster than guile1.3 (tho unsafe on some platforms, debian not one of
> them).
Nope, it's been removed. It was released as part of hamm though, so
you can always go back and fish it out of there.
Cheers,
- Jim
Reply to: