Re: [Re: Nomination talks] IRC is unacceptable

To: Branden Robinson <branden@ecn.purdue.edu>
Cc: Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [Re: Nomination talks] IRC is unacceptable
From: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 15:43:20 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 19981217154320.C14491@debian.org>
Mail-followup-to: Branden Robinson <branden@ecn.purdue.edu>, Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19981217165831.C21559@ecn.purdue.edu>; from Branden Robinson on Thu, Dec 17, 1998 at 04:58:31PM -0500
References: <hamish@debian.org> <[🔎] 199812130929.JAA29721@linda.lfix.co.uk> <[🔎] 19981213024305.A25958@debian.org> <[🔎] 19981214183921.B14660@rising.com.au> <[🔎] 19981214191245.H316@debian.org> <[🔎] 19981215181014.C22207@rising.com.au> <[🔎] 19981217165831.C21559@ecn.purdue.edu>

On Thu, Dec 17, 1998 at 04:58:31PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> THE CHANNEL ISNT MODUR8D BY SUM K1NDA TOPIC COP. BECAUSE MOST UV THE
> D00DZ THEY'RE VALUE HAV1NG THE FREEDOM 2 DISCUSZ WUTEVUR TICKLEZ THERE
[..]

Don't make me have to hurt you, Pinky.

-- 
Sig du jour!

Reply to:

References:
- [Re: Nomination talks] IRC is unacceptable
  - From: "Oliver Elphick" <olly@lfix.co.uk>
- Re: [Re: Nomination talks] IRC is unacceptable
  - From: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>
- Re: [Re: Nomination talks] IRC is unacceptable
  - From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
- Re: [Re: Nomination talks] IRC is unacceptable
  - From: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>
- Re: [Re: Nomination talks] IRC is unacceptable
  - From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
- Re: [Re: Nomination talks] IRC is unacceptable
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@ecn.purdue.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: An old idea, brought back to life
Next by Date: Re: use doc-base not dwww for doco pkgs (was Re: menu system)
Previous by thread: Re: [Re: Nomination talks] IRC is unacceptable
Next by thread: Re: [Re: Nomination talks] IRC is unacceptable
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread