Re: debian list summaries
On 15.12.1998., at 12:07, Martin Schulze wrote:
>> IMHO it would be reasonable to use existing almost empty
>> list (about 60 msgs in last three months!) for this kind
>> of posts - there would be only four to eight of them in
>> one month. And it is an important announcement for
>> developers when there is a update for a package in
>> 'stable', or when libc6 is broken - and not one message
>> about recent problem 'leeked' from -devel to devel-announce.
>>
>> We don't have to (and I certainly don't want to) summarize
>> each and every little thread on -devel, just the obviously
>> important ones. Why would that be abuse?
>
>Yes.
But I asked *why*?
I don't want to request opening a new list if the
only poster there will be me, since I can't guarantee
that I'll always be here to make those summaries.
And that would create one more dead list.
--
enJoy -*/\*- http://jagor.srce.hr/~jrodin/
Reply to: