Re: Debian security (was Re: Nomination question: Redhat)
On Sun, Dec 13, 1998 at 09:47:39PM +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> When it was mentioned -- some people in our country think RedHat is more
> secure than Debian. When I asked them why, I received two non-religious
> answers. One was that Debian is not much visible in "security places"
> (like security-audit, etc.), which makes an impression Debian people are
> not much interested in security. The second was that Debian doesn't
> support PAM, which lowers overall security abilities of the system.
At least one of those are actually important too. =>
"Shall we play a game?" -- WOPR