licensing issue - which list?

To: "Debian Developer's List" <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: licensing issue - which list?
From: Ossama Othman <othman@astrosun.tn.cornell.edu>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 10:51:53 -0500 (EST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.GSO.4.02.9812141049510.27512-100000@breezy.tn.cornell.edu>
Reply-to: Ossama Othman <othman@astrosun.tn.cornell.edu>

Hi guys,

Where should I send e-mails regarding licensing issues?  Specifically,
there is disagreement about TAO's license between Debian and the TAO
developers.

-Ossama
______________________________________________________________________
Ossama Othman <othman@astrosun.tn.cornell.edu>
58 60 1A E8 7A 66 F4 44  74 9F 3C D4 EF BF 35 88  1024/8A04D15D 1998/08/26

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: licensing issue - which list?
  - From: Martin Schulze <joey@linux.de>
- Re: licensing issue - which list?
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
- Re: licensing issue - which list?
  - From: Jens Ritter <jens@hilbert.weh.rwth-aachen.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Proposed recompilation to remove dependency on libc6 2.0.7u
Next by Date: Re: What I'd like to see in a project leader
Previous by thread: Re: Including package's home page with package description
Next by thread: Re: licensing issue - which list?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread