Re: gdb is broken?
J.H.M. Dassen Ray" wrote:
> In the current egcs packages, several patches are applied at build time
> (rather than in the .diff.gz already); this should be doable for gdb too.
> The threads patch could then only be applied on the architectures which it
> supports. This to me seems the best solution: i386 has threads support, and
> non-i386 works as before.
Lame question but why not use defines such as __i386__, __m68k__
etc. like it is done with libraries or so?
No question is too silly to ask, but, of course, some are too silly
to answer. -- Perl book
Please always Cc to me when answering on the lists.