Re: Ammendment: Constituion
>>>>> On Thu, 29 Oct 1998 17:45:16 -0500, Dan Jacobowitz <email@example.com> said:
Dan> On Thu, Oct 29, 1998 at 03:05:24PM -0800, Darren Benham wrote:
>> WHEREAS, In light of the frustration expressed by Manoj and felt
>> by many others, I feel a flaw in the current proposed constitution
>> has been exposed.
>> THEREFORE, I propose the wording of constitution be changed as
>> in Section A.2. Calling for a vote -1. The proposer of a motion or
>> an amendment may call for a vote, +1. The proposer or a second of
>> a motion or an amendment may call for a vote, -2. The proposer of
>> a motion may call for a vote on any or all the +2. The proposer or
>> a second of a motion may call for a vote on any or all the -the
>> proposer of an amendment may call for a vote only on that +the
>> proposer of or a second of an amendment may call for a vote only
>> on that
>> This proposal will require either the approval of Guy and all
>> orginal seconds (of which I am one) or 5 seconds of its own.
Dan> Seconded, if necessary.
And another if neccessary.
@James LewisMoss <firstname.lastname@example.org> | Blessed Be!
@ http://www.ioa.com/~dres | Linux is kewl!
@"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach