Re: SSH v2 [intent to package]
On Thu, Aug 27, 1998 at 08:17:43AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> Guy Maor <email@example.com> wrote:
> > I think you should package this as ssh2, but continue to package
> > version 1 as well. They can conflict. If it's too much work to
> > package both, then just stay with 1.
> I really cannot be bothered. I'm not sure the licence even allows me to run
> it for testing purposes, before releasing the package, so I'm not going to be
> able to use it.
> If someone else wants to package it, I'll certainly help them to make the two
> packages as compatible as possible.
I'm going to do this - I'm the weird situation where
on the other hand I can't use ssh2 for my business and
on the other hand have a proper license for the commercial
Note, I hate the license. However I have people who
really want it for compability with Windows SSH v2
(it allows scp from win).
I will package it as ssh2, make it provide /usr/sbin/ssh2d
etc, and the user can change the symlinks (/usr/bin/ssh) to
choose which version to use. That's the upstream solution..
firstname.lastname@example.org - it's a valid address w/o spam