[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#25845: marked as done (general: libraries are a+x)



Your message dated 18 Aug 1998 22:39:20 -0400
with message-id <oapvdx66g7.fsf@burrito.fake>
and subject line Bug#25845: general: libraries are a+x
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 1998 18:12:50 +0000
Received: (qmail 3402 invoked from network); 17 Aug 1998 18:12:50 -0000
Received: from alfik.ms.mff.cuni.cz (195.113.19.71)
  by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 17 Aug 1998 18:12:50 -0000
Received: from pandora by alfik.ms.mff.cuni.cz; (8.8.8/v1.00/19980602.1840)
	id UAA11357; Mon, 17 Aug 1998 20:12:47 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: by pandora
	via sendmail from stdin
	id <[🔎] m0z8TM9-00000wC@pandora> (Debian Smail3.2.0.101)
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 17 Aug 1998 19:46:09 +0200 (CEST) 
Message-Id: <[🔎] m0z8TM9-00000wC@pandora>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 19:46:09 +0200 (CEST)
From: Patrik Rak <patrik@pandora.ms.mff.cuni.cz>
Subject: general: libraries are a+x
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.5
Reply-To: prak3264@ss1000.ms.mff.cuni.cz

Package: general
Version: N/A

Why are so many libraries installed as executable while others are not?
I see no reason for this (except if one loves the 'Segmentation fault'
message).
 

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.0
Kernel Version: Linux pandora 2.0.35 #1 Sat Aug 1 17:24:40 CEST 1998 i586 unknown


Reply to: