Re: new egcs debian packages -- testers and porters needed
On Fri, Aug 14, 1998 at 05:19:59PM -0700, John Lapeyre wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Aug 1998 jdassen@wi.leidenuniv.nl wrote:
>
> jdasse>We don't have a problem with packages requiring differenent versions of
> jdasse>libstdc++ to run. We have problems if we want to have a setup in which we
> jdasse>can compile against different versions of libstdc++.
>
> I can run packages built with g++272 and g++ on the same system.
> But everytime I want to rebuild one, I have to switch the -dev packages.
> (some packages only compile with one or the other) So we are already in
> this situation. Since the libraries have different version numbers, there
> is no problem at runtime. I assume the only problem with the -dev
> packages is headers occupying the same place. Could we just put them in
> subdirs under /usr/include and require compiling with appropriate -I flags
> ? I'm not asking for one more compiler, just if there is ever going to be
> a time when we don't want at least two c++ compilers.
Which reminds me.
Is there any reason for libg++28-dev and libstdc++29-dev to confilct?
There are no overlapping files between the two.
Dan
Reply to: